
Click to buy if your elevator’s speakers are out-of-order and you need something to reduce the anxiety on the ride to the 54th floor. Avoid otherwise.
Predictability is a funny thing when it comes to music. 12-bar blues, for example, is obviously predictable in terms of structure, based on I-IV-V chords typically arranged in an I-IV-I-V pattern. Any idiot can follow the chords to a 12-bar blues song. What makes blues exciting is either the passion of the singer or the creativity of the soloist: the artist uses the convention as a foundation to express fresh ideas.
Structure doesn’t have to kill creativity; in fact, it often enhances it by forcing the artist to find those new ideas in the same old place. The Shakespearian sonnet has lasted for centuries with a similarly stable structure. Sometimes a poet or a blues singer will mess with the structure to shake things up and heighten the meaning or the feel, like dropping a syllable in a sonnet line or shortening or lengthening one or more of the twelve bars (Robert Johnson did that frequently), but there is always the return to the basic structure that serves to give the reader or listener the comforting feeling of coming home.
Some musicians take a different approach and eschew the predictable. Brian Eno, Robert Fripp and The Vicar immediately come to mind, but a more instructive lesson comes from what Miles Davis did on Kind of Blue. He abandoned scores and even chord progressions for the modal sketch (you can learn more about modes here). Each musician was given a set of scales to play with that defined their boundaries, but not much beyond that. In Ashley Khan’s book Kind of Blue: The Making of the Miles Davis Masterpiece, the event is described as controlled chaos: the musicians essentially showed up at the studio one day with little idea of what they were about to record. Miles gave them a few tips and off they went. The result was one of the greatest jazz albums ever recorded.
With rock and pop music, the issue of predictability is a bit more complex. There are conventions, to be sure, but more possibility for variety than in the blues. Still, there are limits as to how much you can do with chord structures and discover something fresh in these genres while avoiding the bizarre and losing the rhythm. Oasis was onto something in Dig Out Your Soul with its frequent use of half-step chord changes (B to Bb, for example), creating a knockout kick-ass rock song in “Shock of the Lightning,” but, as has been their pattern since inception, they imploded in another tiresome battle of the brothers. The Dahlmanns work wonders with very traditional, predictable chord patterns because of their energy, enthusiasm and commitment to let it rip.
I will confess to a general preference for explorers searching for something beyond the tried-and-true. The person who best described my preferred approach to pop and rock music was none other than Paul McCartney, who became a reliably predictable bore in his post-Beatles career. In an interview with NME in 1966—during the period between Revolver and Sgt. Pepper—McCartney talked about how change was essential to The Beatles’ continuing success:
We have always changed our style as we went along and we’ve never been frightened to develop and change.
I think this has been the reason for our continued success. We could have stopped thinking up new things and brought out ‘Son Of Please Please Me’ or ‘The Son Of Love Me Do,’ but that was not on. We work on one song, and record it, and then get tired of it. So we think up something very different. The strength of any act is doing something that you wouldn’t associate with them.
For instance, I feel that the Supremes are too alike with most of their discs. If they did something good and you said, ‘Who’s that?’ and were told ‘The Supremes’ and you hadn’t identified it with them, you’d be pleasantly surprised. That would add to the strength of their appeal.
All of which brings us to the latest release of Camera Obscura, the Glaswegian indie pop darlings who rode to fame on the same wave of love for all things Scotland that gave us Belle & Sebastian and horny women obsessing over men in kilts. The issue of predictability came up like this: in the first round of my required three rounds of listening, my evil side took over halfway through the second track, a song that definitely sounded like something I’d heard before. I gave myself a challenge: that I could predict every chord change from the third track on.
I nailed five songs in a row, had a little hiccup (I was probably getting cocky) then scored with the next three, ending up with a score of 98%. The bottom line: from a musical perspective, Desire Lines is a complete bore. I had a hard time distinguishing some songs from the others, and when playing the album on my iPod, I had to check to make sure that I hadn’t accidentally activated repeat mode.
In addition to the predictable chord changes, Desire Lines continues Camera Obscura’s continuing march down the path to overproduction, unnecessarily crowded arrangements that add little of interest, and way, way, way too much reverb and echo on Tracyanne Campbell’s vocals. Her vocals earlier in her career were more intimate and introverted; here the production turns her sweet voice into something reminiscent of all those losers on American Idol. I was astonished to read that Neko Case did background vocals on Desire Lines; the arrangements are so mushy I had to strain my ears to identify her rather distinctive voice.
When the chord patterns are predictable and the production questionable, the only places to turn to find something of value in a record are the groove or the lyrics. Forget about the groove here: il n’existe pas. It’s happy pop slop for the most part with a very slight nod to jazz in one song and a dash of country in another. The production doesn’t help much, as any faint hints of rhythm are buried in the muck. However, I had great hope for the lyrics, for I’d often found Tracyanne’s lyrics interesting and witty.
Not this time. The lyrics are pretty pedestrian, with hints of past cleverness but really no there there. Here’s a snippet from “Do It Again” (hardly an original title):
Call my number: twenty-six and three-quarters
Turn all the lights down
Let’s do it again
You were insatiable
I was more than capable
And you fought in my corner
Would you do it again?
You, you’re walking around
Can you see tears on this clown?
One more time around
Let’s do it again
Let’s do it again
Let’s do it again
Let’s do it again
Perceptive readers will note the nod to Smokey Robinson. One feeling I had listening to Desire Lines was that many of the songs echoed melodic lines and styles of artists from the pre-Beatles 60′s era like Connie Francis and Rosie and the Originals. This is not a bad thing in itself, but they took that tendency a bit too far with the song, “Every Weekday.” Whoever controls Rick Nelson’s estate would be very interested in that track, as the melody is clearly lifted from “Traveling Man.” The title track gives a nod to Carson McCullers; fortunately, I can find no evidence that Ms. McCullers ever penned a pop song, so her estate’s attorneys are out of luck.
A desire path is what humans create when they want from Point A to Point B and take a shortcut through the woods. If the desire path here was to create more conventional, predictable pop that would offend no one, Camera Obscura has succeeded completely. I wish them well on their journey but will take my delicate ears elsewhere to satisfy my preferences for more depth and originality.
Fortunately, I don’t have to look far in Bonny Scotland: Glasgow’s Admiral Fallow combines striking lyrics, novel arrangements, remarkable power and yes, originality.
Filed under: 2013, Contemporary Music Reviews, Rock and Alternative Tagged: Admiral Fallow, Brian Eno, Camera Obscura, Carson McCullers, Glasgow bands, Miles Davis, Paul McCartney, Robert Fripp, Robert Johnson, Shock of the Lightning, Smokey Robinson, Supremes
